Mainly For Brummies But All Are Welcome To Join In The Birmingham Fun & Chat


The future of the Royal Family

#1 by Sheldonboy , Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:41 am

What is your opinion.?
Do you care?



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15282940


I started out with nothing and Iv'e still got most of it left
http://brummiestalking.org.uk/

 
Sheldonboy

Founder Member
Forum Administrator
Posts: 43.994
Date registered 12.22.2009


RE: The future of the Royal Family

#2 by signman ( deleted ) , Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:51 am

Couldn't give a monkeys.

signman

RE: The future of the Royal Family

#3 by Voltman , Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:49 am

I was discussing this with her next door just the other day,
Seems so unfair, they would end up in the court of human rights.


Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. - Benjamin Franklin

http://brummiestalking.org.uk/ [Spacer]

 
Voltman

Founder Member
Technical Administrator
Posts: 18.437
Date registered 02.24.2010

Last edited 10.13.2011 | Top

RE: The future of the Royal Family

#4 by phil ( deleted ) , Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:38 pm

I don't care either way myself, I would rather the whole of the monarchy was done away with and then they could do what they liked with their ill gotten gains.

Phil


Make Love, Not War

phil

RE: The future of the Royal Family

#5 by Sheldonboy , Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:41 pm

So you would have liked Blair, Brown, Cameron as a President would you.


I started out with nothing and Iv'e still got most of it left
http://brummiestalking.org.uk/

 
Sheldonboy

Founder Member
Forum Administrator
Posts: 43.994
Date registered 12.22.2009


RE: The future of the Royal Family

#6 by phil ( deleted ) , Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:29 pm

No Brown or Cameron would certainly have never made president because neither of them were elected, they both made the top job by default. I didn't vote for Blair who thought he was president anyway so I couldn't be blamed for that disaster.

Phil


Make Love, Not War

phil

RE: The future of the Royal Family

#7 by Sheldonboy , Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:39 pm

The Queen is not there for the power that she has, The Queen is there for the power that she denies anyone else.
Considering the complete shower of misfits in parliament at present ( and for many a long year ) who would you have as head of state. Mavis the Commons cleaner. She would probably be more trustworthy.


I started out with nothing and Iv'e still got most of it left
http://brummiestalking.org.uk/

 
Sheldonboy

Founder Member
Forum Administrator
Posts: 43.994
Date registered 12.22.2009


RE: The future of the Royal Family

#8 by phil ( deleted ) , Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:03 pm

SB

As far as I am concerned they could hold a national lottery of everybody who wanted to be considered and that passed certain criteria.

Phil


Make Love, Not War

phil

RE: The future of the Royal Family

#9 by mikejee , Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:46 pm

Two of the criteria would have to be that they would have to be sane and not corrupt. That would at least get rid of all the peripheral royal family ( and some of the none-peripheral like charles and his whorrible wife), and most politicians


mikejee  
mikejee

Founder Member
Posts: 3.265
Date registered 12.26.2009


RE: The future of the Royal Family

#10 by signman ( deleted ) , Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:52 pm

May be Kate is pregnant.

signman

RE: The future of the Royal Family

#11 by Voltman , Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:54 pm

I think love 'em or hate 'em, they are the least of this county's problems.


Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. - Benjamin Franklin

http://brummiestalking.org.uk/ [Spacer]

 
Voltman

Founder Member
Technical Administrator
Posts: 18.437
Date registered 02.24.2010


   

Abused children
Save the Rainforest

Thank you for visiting our humble forum, make this your forum by joining us and posting your own thoughts and questions.
Xobor Create your own Forum with Xobor